Reviews on Womens Ultrawarm Coat Three Quarter Length

When the days go shorter and the mercury drops, it's time to reach for a winter jacket to guard confronting the cold. Lightweight puffies have their place for 3-flavor use, merely you'll want a well-insulated, serious piece for truly frigid conditions. The women's jackets and parkas hither are amongst the warmest available and use down (and sometimes synthetic) insulation and tightly woven shell fabrics to trap warmth and resist howling winds. We've included a range of options from casual mid-thigh parkas to functioning-oriented puffies and expedition-grade jackets. For background information, see the comparison table and buying advice below the picks.

---

Our Team's Women'southward Wintertime Jacket Picks

• Best Everyday Wintertime Parka: Patagonia Down With Information technology Parka
• Best Budget Winter Parka:REI Co-op Norseland Insulated Parka
• Best Waterproof Winter Parka: Patagonia Tres 3-in-1 Parka
• Best Heavyweight Functioning Down Jacket:Outdoor Inquiry Super Alpine
• Best Winter Parka for Extreme Cold: Canada Goose Trek Parka

---

Best Everyday Wintertime Parka for Women

i. Patagonia Down With It Parka ($299)

Fill up: 8.three oz. of 600-fill-power down
Center back length: 40 in.
Waterproof: No
What we similar: Patagonia's typical performance and quality in a cozy and fashionable parka.
What we don't: Average-quality downward and no waterproofing.

For everyday activities like running errands, dropping the kids off at school, or taking a walk around the cake, it's hard to vanquish the warmth and styling of a down parka. At that place's no shortage of options (including many of the picks below), merely Patagonia's Downwardly With It Parka stands out for its combination of premium build quality, bonny colorways and finishes, and thoughtful feature set, including a two-manner front zip (vital for riding a cycle or sitting in a parka) and removable hood. For insulation, you get a generous 8.3 ounces of 600-make full downward—enough warmth for all but the most frigid winter conditions—and an extra-long forty-inch centre dorsum length. All told, it's no secret why the Downward With It Parka has become one of the about well-loved wintertime jackets, twelvemonth after twelvemonth.

Parka-length jackets offer a sizable boost in warmth, but the mode isn't for everyone. Luckily, the Down With It likewise comes in a hip-length cutting ($199), which lines upward nicely for city wearable but can also pull double duty for calorie-free adventuring like snowshoeing (bonus: it also takes upwardly a lot less room in your suitcase or duffel while traveling). There are a few minor shortcomings to both styles: For i, the 600-fill duck downwards doesn't offer as much warmth for weight as a jacket like the Stormhenge beneath (the higher the fill number, the loftier the downward), but this should be of fiddling concern to most casual users. Second, while the DWR finish resists light wet, information technology's by no ways a waterproof jacket similar the Tres or Patera below and should not be worn when wet weather is in the forecast. But the Down With Information technology is all y'all need for dry or sub-freezing weather, and it's hard to crush the polished fit and finish of a Patagonia slice...Read in-depth review
Come across the Patagonia Down With Information technology Parka  See the Patagonia Downwards With It Jacket

All-time Budget Women'due south Winter Parka

ii. REI Co-op Norseland Insulated Parka ($199)

Fill: 650-fill-power down
Middle back length: 36.5 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: A warm and stylish down parka for just $199.
What nosotros don't: Boxier than most parka-length jackets.

REI Co-op is known for making quality gear that considerably undercuts the competition, and their winter-set up Norseland Insulated Parka follows suit. At just $199, REI'south downwards parka saves yous effectually $100 (or more) compared to similar jackets without sacrificing much in the fashion of performance. In terms of specs, you get mid-range 650-fill downward (even high than the insulation in our peak-ranked Down With It), a DWR-coated vanquish, and additional features like a fleece-lined hood, stylish knit cuffs, and an insulated storm flap over the front nil.

Our biggest gripe about the Norseland has to do with fit: While nearly mid-thigh-length parkas feature a stylish, A-line design, the REI is definitively on the boxy side. This does interpret to greater mobility and room for layering, but the Norseland lacks the more flattering, tailored fit of jackets like the Down With It above and Marmot Montreal below. That said, we like what REI has done with the side zips, which extend 6 inches upwards each side to permit for better liberty of movement while sitting, walking, or biking (they likewise provide venting should y'all work up a sweat). Added upwards, the Norseland is a competitive option for value seekers and those who don't mind the roomier shape. And for even more savings, REI also offers their 650 Downwards Parka, only it falls brusque of the Co-op's usual standards in terms of immovability and build quality.
See the REI Co-op Norseland Insulated Parka

All-time Waterproof Winter Parka for Women

iii. Patagonia Tres 3-in-1 Parka ($599)

Make full: v.3 oz. of 700-fill up-power down
Centre back length: 35.5 in.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Waterproof protection and the selection to add together or subtract warmth.
What we don't: Expensive.

Not everyone will demand a waterproof winter jacket, particularly in regions where wintertime weather is particularly dry or common cold. Simply for mild and wet conditions (nosotros're looking at you, PNW), a waterproof shell can be a actually overnice feature to have. Within this category, we're big fans of the 3-in-1 jacket: Wear the insulated layer on cold and dry out days, don the waterproof vanquish in rain, and pair both for protection against the virtually wintery of atmospheric condition. Patagonia's Tres 3-in-1 is a delinquent favorite, with a 2-layer waterproof shell and moderately insulated downwardly jacket on the inside. Tack on Patagonia's typical proficient looks and summit-notch build quality, and the Tres is a well-made and bonny design for moderate winter temperatures and drippy conditions.

What are the downsides of the Patagonia Tres? Get-go and foremost, it's pricey at $599, even considering the versatility of the 3-in-1 design. In addition, the liner isn't super warm with just 5.3 ounces of 700-fill down (Patagonia's Frozen Range 3-in-one offers twice the insulation), although the Tres is perfectly suitable for temperatures right effectually freezing. And last but not least, fit can be tricky with parkas—and particularly with this coat given all the moving parts—and the Tres is known to be on the slim side (we recommend trying it on before yous buy). But we love the bundle deal and option to easily tailor your layering, which is why we have the three-in-1 ranked here. For an all-in-one solution with a similar aesthetic, bank check out the Arc'teryx Patera Parka below, only in the cease you'll pay more for less versatility.
See the Patagonia Tres 3-in-1 Parka

All-time Heavyweight Performance Downward Jacket

four. Outdoor Research Super Alpine Down Parka ($399)

Fill: 7 oz. of 800-fill-ability down
Center back length: 32.five in.
Waterproof: No
What we similar: A warm and water-resistant parka with a host of technical features.
What we don't: Heavy and not everyone will love the longer length.

The picks above are great for casual and effectually-town wear, but at that place are a number of more technical offerings for demanding backcountry pursuits. Taking warmth, features, and value into consideration, our favorite option for 2022 is the Outdoor Inquiry Super Alpine Downwards Parka. First and foremost, you get a whopping 7 ounces of 800-fill up hydrophobic down, which is considerably more bang for your buck than most casual jackets here. The OR as well sports a water-resistant Pertex Quantum Pro shell with a DWR cease that offers impressive protection confronting dripping ice and wet snow, along with functional extras like internal stash pockets and adjustments at the hood, hem, and cuffs.

All that said, the Super Alpine isn't for anybody. The parka has a adequately technical look, and the longer hem won't appeal to some climbers and skiers. 2d, the 30-denier shell fabric is respectable in the performance category and keeps weight low, but the jacket is more than delicate than most casual options on this list, specially jackets with robust shells similar the TNF Arctic Parka and Fjallraven Nuuk beneath. Finally, the Super Tall is heavy compared to like jackets—Rab's more affordable Neutrino Pro (largely unavailable at the fourth dimension of publishing) weighs over seven ounces less for just as much insulation; and for a large step upward in price, the Patagonia Form Vii ($899) and Arc'teryx Alpha Parka ($999) are also warmer and lighter. But the OR is the most well-rounded heavyweight puffy for its combination of warmth, cost, and availability, with all the functioning about winter adventurers need.
See the OR Super Alpine Down Parka

Best Women'due south Winter Parka for Extreme Cold

v. Canada Goose Expedition Parka ($i,495)

Fill: 625-fill-ability down
Eye back length: 32 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Stylish and rated for temperatures as low as -22˚F.
What we don't: Very expensive.

At the premium end of the spectrum is Toronto-based Canada Goose. These jackets are the existent bargain: They're extremely warm, well-built, and downright fashionable. Originally developed for scientists working at McMurdo Station in Antarctica, the Expedition Parka is one of Canada Goose's well-nigh formidable jackets and i of a select few to receive their "Farthermost" temperature rating (-22˚F or lower). Features like a fur-lined brim and secure waist cinch keep drafts at bay, while a water-resistant Chill Tech trounce surrounds the generous dose of 625-fill duck downwardly (information technology's ironic that the company uses generally duck down and not goose). On the style side, a mid-thigh cut, drop-in utility pockets, and durable beat out create an aesthetic that tin can play the part in Brooklyn or Breckenridge—you choose.

It's difficult to debate with Canada Goose'south awesome warmth, craftsmanship, and looks, simply these practise come at a price—in this case, it's a staggering $1,495. In add-on, prepare yourself to overheat in all merely the coldest conditions: Canada Goose fifty-fifty includes built-in backpack straps that let you to hang the jacket over your shoulders when not in apply. And finally, the Expedition Parka is the heaviest and bulkiest offering here, which tin can exist a challenge for travel (you'll need a bigger suitcase) or during long stints on your feet. But if you run cold, need the extra insulation, or appreciate the styling, Canada Goose has a valuable corner of the market.
See the Canada Goose Expedition Parka

Best of the Residue

6. The Due north Face Arctic Parka ($300)

Fill up: 550-make full down & 150g Heatseeker
Center back length: 35.75 in.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Durable shell cloth and a swell value.
What we don't: Heavy and has a boxy fit.

Wintertime weather is more than but freezing temperatures: It can too mean snow or rain, biting winds, and lots of slush. For affordable protection in any Mother Nature throws your manner, we dear the Arctic from The North Face. This parka is both nicely insulated and conditions-ready, with 550-fill up-power down and TNF's Heatseeker synthetic insulation wrapped in a ii-layer, waterproof DryVent beat (it'south also seam-sealed). The above-the-genu cut extends coverage down the legs without existence likewise restrictive, and a removable imitation fur skirt adds warmth and style. Added upward, the Chill is a neat value at $300, and the durable shell and overall structure mean you tin wait a long lifespan out of the jacket.

Merely while the Arctic Parka is bully for everyday use, it's non a standout in versatility. Compared to the Super Alpine above, for case, it's considerably heavier and more restrictive. And held up against options like the Canada Goose Expedition Parka, y'all get a lot less warmth—in fact, despite its proper name, we don't recommend the Arctic for temperatures below freezing. Finally, in terms of fit, we've institute the Arctic to exist slightly boxy from the waist downwardly and recommend sizing up if you have broad shoulders. But these gripes aside, the Arctic nevertheless is a nice option for those who need the waterproofing and are looking to stay in the $300 price range. Finally, it's worth noting that TNF updated the jacket recently (it'due south at present lighter and lacks synthetic insulation), but nosotros've kept the more than weather condition-ready iteration here while supplies final.
See The North Confront Arctic Parka

7. Outdoor Research Coze Down Parka ($349)

Fill: viii.3 oz. 700-fill up-power down
Center back length: 43 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: A true articulatio genus-length parka with a durable woven beat.
What we don't: Expensive and sizing can exist tricky.

We frequently plough to Outdoor Research for reasonably priced technical outerwear (as evidenced by the Super Alpine higher up), but the Seattle-based company has gone fully casual with the Coze Downward Parka here. And we like what they've washed, combining loftier-quality materials with an elegant urban style. The genu-length Coze is by far the longest parka on this listing, touting a 43-inch centre back length that'southward a total 10 inches longer than jackets similar the Marmot Montreal and Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown below. On height of that, you get a soft and durable 70x90-denier plain weave beat—groovy for withstanding the rigors of metropolis apply—and side zips that make it easy to sit, bike, or bulldoze.

At that place are a lot of reasons you might want the extra coverage of the Coze, especially in particularly frigid winter climates. For 1, the length eliminates the need for insulated pants on quick jaunts effectually the block. Second, you're ensured insulation under you when sitting, which y'all don't always become with a parka-length jacket. And finally, the style is undeniably classy, whether you're walking the dog or going out on a Sabbatum dark. Keep in mind that sizing tin be catchy—nosotros recommend finding a style to try on the Coze or purchasing from an online retailer with a skilful return policy—and unlike many parkas, you don't become a cinch at the waist. Only for peak-notch coverage from a trusted brand, the Coze is an bonny choice. It's likewise worth noting that Patagonia now makes a similar jacket in their Silent Down Long Parka ($399), which is a bit longer at 44.5 inches and checks in at a similar weight and warmth.
See the Outdoor Research Coze Down Parka

8. Fjallraven Nuuk Parka ($500)

Make full: eight.8 oz. of Supreme Microloft synthetic
Center back length: 33.9 in.
Waterproof: Yes
What we similar: Good looks and fantabulous build quality.
What we don't: Decidedly casual and pricey for a synthetic piece.

Like to Canada Goose, Fjallraven makes good-looking outdoor gear that toes the line betwixt casual and functioning (at to the lowest degree casual levels of functioning). The Nuuk Parka is a durable slice that offers solid warmth and weather resistance with 8.8 ounces of Supreme Microloft constructed insulation, a water- and windproof outer beat out, and clean lines representative of the company'south Scandinavian heritage. You as well get a well-rounded assortment of storage and features, including a fleece-lined and fur-brimmed detachable hood, a whopping 11 total pockets, and ribbed knitting at the neck to seal out drafts. All in all, it's a refined, weather condition-ready wintertime parka with a high attention to item.

If you similar Fjallraven'south styling (we exercise) and don't need the low weight or impressive packability of down insulation, the Nuuk Parka is a fine option. That said, information technology's too heavy and bulky to bring into the backcountry and lacks the lofty, cozy feel of down-stuffed alternatives like the Patagonia Down With It higher up. And for $500, the Nuuk doesn't strike united states equally a specially bang-up value, costing considerably more than most other synthetic options (their Kiruna Calorie-free and Kiruna Padded parkas are cheaper at $365 and $350 respectively but less warm and characteristic-rich). That said, the stylish build and well-appointed design set the Nuuk apart from the residuum of the market, earning information technology a spot on our list. And if you adopt downwardly insulation, the Singi Downwardly Jacket has a similar design but uses 7.4 ounces of 500-fill-power downwards for $100 more.
Meet the Fjallraven Nuuk Parka

9. Outdoor Inquiry Coldfront Downwards Hoodie ($229)

Fill up: 6.three oz. of 700-make full down; 150g VerticalX ECO
Center back length: 29.5 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Comfortable, versatile, and affordably priced for what you get.
What nosotros don't: Not a standout in warmth or coverage.

Like REI, Outdoor Research is known for providing a lot of bang for your cadet, and their new Coldfront Downwardly Hoodie does just that. For $229, the hip-length Coldfront offers a competitive mix of protection and warmth with atmospheric condition-ready VerticalX ECO synthetic insulation at the shoulders and cuffs and quality 700-fill up-power down everywhere else. In trying on the jacket for the beginning time, we were struck by the soft-even so-rugged shell and thoughtful touches like fleece lining in the paw pockets and snug-plumbing equipment cuff gaiters with pollex loops. All told, it's a well-rounded selection for everyday use and outdoor adventuring in most moderate winter atmospheric condition.

That said, it's of import to note that the Coldfront contains less down than some of our picks above, including the Downwardly With It (jacket) and performance-prepare Super Tall. It's not exactly an apples-to-apples comparing given the differences in fill power, and the Coldfront certainly looks the role with its puffy build, only don't expect Antarctic-set warmth. Also keep in mind that despite the generous hip-length style (back length is listed at 29.5 in.) there's no below-the-butt coverage, which detracts from overall protection and won't proceed your legs warm like the longer parkas on our list. With the right layering, nonetheless, or if you plan to mix in hiking or snowshoeing, the Coldfront is a perfectly serviceable option with attractive styling that boosts its all-around appeal (yous can wear information technology around town or in the backcountry).
See the Outdoor Research Coldfront

10. Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown Parka ($325)

Fill: 700-fill-power down
Center back length: 33 in.
Waterproof: No
What nosotros like: Attractive and versatile styling; crush textile is stretchy and durable.
What we don't: A fleck shorter and boxier than most parkas.

Upon commencement glance, information technology'southward like shooting fish in a barrel to come across that the Stretchdown Parka looks a lilliputian different from your standard down jacket. Instead of the typical shiny fabric and horizontal baffles, Mountain Hardwear uses welded seams and a stretchy material (hence the "Stretchdown") that's almost softshell-like in nature. The net result is comfy down insulation that moves with yous, is remarkably durable, and doesn't leave you looking similar the Michelin Homo. The Stretchdown collection features a range of styles, and the Parka here delivers the nigh coverage and warmth for true winter weather.

After wearing the Stretchdown Parka for nearly of the wintertime, we're stiff proponents of the jacket with a few small caveats. First is the shape: Compared to most parkas it's a bit shorter at just 33 inches (on par with the Marmot Montreal beneath but 5 in. shorter than the Patagonia Downward With It Parka) and has no taper in the waist. This no-frills fit makes the Stretchdown slightly more than versatile for performance use (with a 2-way front end zip, it functions great over a harness as a belay jacket) but will limit its street appeal for some. 2nd, it doesn't offer quite every bit much warmth equally heavyweight pieces like the Coze in a higher place. Merely we're large fans of the versatile design, and it's hard to vanquish the immovability and paw experience of the soft and stretchy beat out.
Come across the Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown Parka

11. Arc'teryx Patera Parka ($649)

Fill up: five.5 oz. of 750-fill down; 60g & 100g Coreloft
Middle back length: 36.75 in.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Waterproof, top-notch structure, and looks cracking.
What we don't: Ane of the priciest parkas here and not the warmest.

Many of the casual women'due south parkas on this listing are in the sub-$300 price range, only nobody does jackets quite like Arc'teryx. The sleek Patera is the whole package: You get premium 750-fill goose downwardly with synthetic Coreloft insulation added in areas most prone to getting wet, a proven 2-layer Gore-Tex shell for waterproofing, and a archetype design that tin be worn pretty much anywhere. Add in a overnice variety of colour options and the premium build quality that Arc'teryx is known for, and you have a fantastic winter parka that should stand upward to common cold and wet conditions for years to come up.

The biggest hurdle in choosing the Patera Parka is cost: At $649, it's more than than double the cost of jackets like the Patagonia Downward With Information technology and TNF Arctic above without offering whatsoever additional warmth, which puts information technology out of reach for many people. However, you practise get some serious return on your investment. The total waterproofing is a very nice feature, and few casual pieces use best-in-class Gore-Tex. You besides get a tough-yet-smooth 75-denier shell, which tin handle everyday wear and tear much better than the thinner options above. Finally, we appreciate the non-puffy style of the Patera, which manages to be reasonably insulated and conditions-resistant while keeping a low-profile, near rain jacket-similar look. And for an even warmer waterproof option from Arc'teryx, bank check out their Centrale Parka... Read in-depth review
Run into the Arc'teryx Patera Parka

12. Patagonia DAS Parka ($449)

Fill: 133g & 40g PrimaLoft Gold Eco
Center back length: 30 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: The wet-weather balls of synthetic insulation.
What we don't: Expensive and sparse confront fabric is very fragile.

The vast majority of jackets hither apply down fill, which is warmer (for the weight) and loftier than synthetic insulation. But there are undeniable benefits to synthetics: they continue to insulate when moisture, breathe better, and provide a cruelty-free, vegan pick for consumers (for more on the topic, run into our article on down vs. synthetic insulation). One of our favorite common cold-weather synthetic jackets, the Patagonia DAS Parka, is a high-performance piece that uses unique insulation mapping to pack in warmth while keeping weight on par with many technical down puffies (for reference, it'southward seven.5 oz. lighter than the OR Super Alpine to a higher place). To tiptop it off, the DAS is mountain-ready with a robust Pertex Quantum Pro shell, helmet-compatible hood, and two-manner front zipper with a protective wind flap.

In terms of downsides, the DAS Parka is a decidedly technical slice, with a very roomy fit and loud colorways that are polarizing for everyday use. And while in that location's no denying that the warmth is impressive for the weight, especially for a synthetic jacket, cost remains high at $449 (synthetics generally save you some coin, just not in this instance). In brusk, the DAS has limited daily entreatment, but for the right surround—think drippy alpine belays or digging snowfall pits while backcountry skiing—it's a overnice pick. And for drier weather condition or when infinite is at a premium, Patagonia'due south down-filled Fitz Roy ($399) offers roughly the same corporeality of warmth at only 14.eight ounces... Read in-depth review
Run into the Patagonia DAS Parka

13. Marmot Montreal Coat ($285)

Fill up: 7.1 oz. of 700-make full-power down
Middle back length: 33 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Bonny styling and great mobility and comfort.
What nosotros don't: Warmth falls short of many of the longer down parkas above.

Winter jackets come in a range of styles and vary considerably in terms of warmth, but the Marmot Montreal Glaze strikes a dainty middle basis for near winter environments. Reasonably priced at $285, you get a healthy dose of 700-make full-power downwardly and a mid-thigh cut that keeps you covered without limiting mobility. Different most puffy jackets here, the Marmot is lined with a soft and supple fleece along the torso, cuffs, and hand pockets, and a removable faux fur liner effectually the hood keeps cold air out and tacks on an extra dose of style. Add in a durable h2o repellant finish, and the Montreal is a prissy everyday defense against the cold and occasional atmospheric precipitation.

We love the cut of the Marmot, which hovers about mid-thigh and offers a more mobile and playful feel than longer jackets like the Down With It above (33 vs. 40-in. center back length). This style is bully for activities like riding a wheel and shoveling the driveway, simply you practise give up a meaning amount of coverage and warmth. Further, the parka'southward overall build quality is a bit less impressive than the aforementioned Patagonia, with a thinner shell that won't hold up as well over fourth dimension. All gripes bated, we've plant the Montreal to be sufficient for temperatures higher up twenty degrees Fahrenheit, which is a good match for the majority of wintertime conditions in virtually of the U.S (continue in listen that Marmot too offers the warmer Montreaux, which features a 6 in. longer hem for simply $15 more). And like many casual parkas, it does take a trim fit, and then consider sizing upwardly if y'all plan to layer underneath...Read in-depth review
See the Marmot Montreal Coat

14. REI Co-op Stormhenge Downwards Hybrid ($259)

Make full: 850-fill-power down; 180g & 80g synthetic
Centre back length: 28.25 in.
Waterproof: Yes
What nosotros like: Great warmth and atmospheric condition protection at an affordable price.
What nosotros don't: Not as warm as performance options similar the Super Alpine in a higher place.

Parkas take bang-up casual appeal and their warmth is unmatched, only we love the versatility and mobility of a standard-length wintertime jacket. More than than most, the REI Stormhenge hits a great residual between everyday and performance utilize, coupling clean lines and classy colorways with a laundry list of technical features. In terms of warmth and weather condition protection, you become torso-mapped 850-fill goose down, recycled synthetic insulation in areas prone to wet and sweat, and a 2-layer waterproof beat. The Stormhenge also features a fully adjustable hood with typhoon neckband, Velcro cuffs, and pit zips to further seal out (or let in) the elements. The result is an insulating jacket that does a decent job keeping out weather, ideal for everything from drippy ice climbing and backcountry skiing to—our personal favorite—35-degrees-and-rainy.

The Stormhenge got a overnice update this year, including a longer cutting (by over 2 inches), more than sustainably produced fabrics, ii additional internal pockets (including a drop pocket for stashing gloves and skins), and the aforementioned synthetic insulation. REI still doesn't provide a fill-weight spec, but we've found the previous model to exist warm into the low 20s Fahrenheit with but a light baselayer underneath (the new version is 4 oz. heavier, and so it'due south likely just as insulating). Of grade, it's of import to have reasonable expectations when shopping from REI's in-firm drove, but the Stormhenge is impressively high-quality and well-designed for the price. If you're on the lookout for a jacket that can evangelize equal parts atmospheric condition protection and warmth, it's well worth a look.
See the REI Co-op Stormhenge Down Hybrid

15. Patagonia Jackson Glacier Parka ($399)

Fill up: six oz. of 700-fill-power down
Center dorsum length: 38 in.
Waterproof: No
What nosotros like: Great mix of style and functioning.
What nosotros don't: Expensive however not fully waterproof.

Patagonia's waterproof Tres Parka above is a great choice for those who desire the versatility of a iii-in-ane pattern, but for slightly less protection and a lot of savings, the Jackson Glacier is a capable alternative. Bachelor in both a jacket and a parka version, the Jackson Glacier features a ii-layer shell with DWR finish for aplenty protection against most winter weather, forth with a healthy dose of downward insulation that'southward nicely cozy without adding too much bulk. The Patagonia also features storm cuffs, a h2o-resistant main zip, and run up-free (bonded) baffles, all of which help trap warmth and seal out wind (in our testing, the parka proved to exist fairly windproof). Tack on a mid-thigh cut (38 in.) and a soft face fabric, and the Jackson Glacier is equal parts functional and bonny jacket for everyday use.

All that said, the Jackson Glacier Parka drops out of our pinnacle ten picks for a few reasons. At $399, it'due south not the best value—OR's Coze Parka above, for instance, provides considerably more warmth for around $50 less. Second, its weatherproofing measures increase the cost without adding too much to performance—we've found the 2-layer crush to be protective enough for odd dashes between the car and the grocery shop, but the polyester confront textile volition begin to absorb moisture in sustained rain (unlike the Tres, you don't go a waterproof membrane). Merely for the right climate, in that location's a lot to like near the Jackson Glacier, and it doesn't hurt that it'south made with both recycled down and vanquish fabric—a attestation to Patagonia'southward continued focus on sustainability. And every bit we touched on above, the Jackson Glacier besides comes in a hip-length jacket version for $50 less...Read in-depth review
See the Patagonia Jackson Glacier Parka

16. The N Face Metropolis ($300)

Fill: 550-fill-ability down
Center back length: 37 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Keen city mode in a lightweight packet.
What nosotros don't: Non the best value.

If your top priority is mode and you don't anticipate needing many technical features, The N Face's City fits the nib. The Metropolis is one of the almost ubiquitous winter parkas on the market, combining the style of a downwardly puffy with a articulatio genus-length cut (37 in.) and dramatic drop-tail hem. And at well nether 2 pounds, this jacket manages to continue weight depression despite its generous coverage, keeping you feeling calorie-free and unrestricted (the two-way zipper helps, as well). Tack on a tall collar, removable hood, and DWR finish, and yous go fully serviceable protection for mild winter days.

However, despite its reasonable price tag, the Metropolis is non a great value compared to jackets similar the Marmot Montreal and REI Co-op Stormhenge higher up. The 550-fill-power down is adequately disappointing in terms of warmth for its weight, making the Metropolis 1 of the least insulative winter jackets we've tested (we wouldn't take it into below-freezing temperatures). Further, The Northward Face up's quality and attention to detail go out much to be desired (we experienced leaking feathers and a sticky front zip), and particularly considering you can go Patagonia's well-congenital Down With Information technology Parka for the same price. In the end, the Metropolis doesn't stand out from a functioning perspective, only if you like the mode, it'll get the job done in almost casual environments.
See The Northward Face Metropolis Parka

17. Cotopaxi Solazo ($220)

Make full: 650-fill-power down
Center back length: 27 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Affordable, cozy, and sustainably fabricated.
What we don't: Fragile shell and minimal weather condition protection.

Cotopaxi has become a delinquent favorite with their retro color blocking and commitment to making "Gear for Adept," and the Solazo puts it all together in a winter-weight downwards jacket. With a fairly uncomplicated hoodless blueprint, the Solazo features responsibly sourced 650-fill-power down (the fill weight is not specified) in a sparse xx-denier ripstop nylon trounce. The event is a lightweight jacket (Cotopaxi puts information technology anywhere from 12 to 16 oz. depending on the size) with a generous amount of loft, which adds upwards to requite you that coveted sleeping-handbag-like feel.

The Solazo can certainly get the job washed during cold nights of camping or even on chilly days on the slopes, but it tin can't measure out up to operation-oriented jackets like the Super Alpine and DAS Parka to a higher place. With only a lite DWR coating, you lot won't desire to be caught out in sustained rain in the Cotopaxi, and the hoodless pattern isn't slap-up for technical use. What's more, the 650-fill down doesn't compress equally well as more premium insulations (the jacket also excludes a stuff sack or stuff pocket). And finally, the Solazo has a fairly boxy fit, which could be a pro or con depending on your style preferences. But at merely $220, information technology's ane of the most affordable jackets here and a versatile selection for both in-town and calorie-free backcountry employ.
See the Women's Cotopaxi Solazo

eighteen. Arc'teryx Andessa Jacket ($949)

Fill: 2.i oz. of 750-fill up downward; 80g & 100g Coreloft
Middle back length: 26 in.
Waterproof: Yep
What nosotros like: A waterproof and warm jacket that doubles downward for resort skiing.
What we don't: Pricey and non as long as more casual parkas.

The Arc'teryx Andessa is a unique addition hither: it's designed as a resort ski jacket but arguably is but as functional (if non more so) for daily wear. To start, information technology's waterproof and very warm with a combination of 750-fill down, constructed insulation in moisture-prone areas, and a nigh impervious three-layer Gore-Tex Pro cloth. We beloved the sleek look, and Arc'teryx even opted for features like flaps over the pocket zippers to go on it clean. Last simply non to the lowest degree, the interior is smooth, cozy, and reminiscent of a high-stop down puffy. You certainly tin ski with the Andessa and many people do, but the hood and pulverisation skirt are removable, and information technology makes for a great dual-purpose option.

Compared to the more coincidental winter parkas on the list, there are some shortcomings with the Andessa. First, the cut is shorter and offers less coverage than a model similar Arc'teryx's ain Patera above, which also happens to be significantly cheaper at $649. 2d, the Andessa is fairly burly and has a fortress-like experience, which is great for those who run cold but can be overkill for moderate winter conditions (we accept had a tendency to overheat while skiing hard). That said, we love the versatility of the Andessa, and its two-for-ane nature makes the cost easier to swallow. For more of our recommendations for both elevator-served and backcountry skiing, cheque out our article on the all-time women's ski jackets.
See the Arc'teryx Andessa Jacket

19. Columbia Heavenly Long Hooded Jacket ($150)

Fill up: Polyester
Center dorsum length: 34 in.
Waterproof: No
What we like: A not bad value and make clean overall blueprint.
What we don't: Non as warm or soft as a downwards jacket.

Wintertime jackets are an expensive bunch, merely budget-oriented brand Columbia offers some intriguing alternatives that save you a good deal of cash. Our favorite is the Heavenly Long Hooded Jacket, which checks many of the boxes we expect for in a cold-weather condition slice while coming in at a very reasonable $150 toll bespeak. For warmth, yous get a good for you amount of Columbia's in-firm polyester fill up (although a fill weight isn't provided), along with a shiny Omni-Estrus reflective lining, h2o-resistant beat, comfortable hood, and surprisingly good fit and pattern for the price. Despite the name, the Heavenly certainly isn't every bit pillowy soft as down, but it'south a good-looking jacket and one heckuva value.

What are the downsides of a jacket like the Columbia Heavenly? It won't pack away into a suitcase most as small-scale every bit a comparable downwardly jacket (constructed insulation is much less compressible), and you don't get the aforementioned warmth for the weight either. The jacket does get reasonably high marks for beingness cozy in common cold conditions, only y'all likely will want to layer upward when the temperatures get truly frigid. These bug bated, the jacket looks the part for both outdoor and urban use, comes in a diversity of dainty colorways—and given the cost—remains popular year after year.
Run across the Columbia Heavenly Long Hooded Jacket

Women'due south Winter Jacket Comparison Table​

Jacket	Toll	Insulation	Length	Weight	Waterproof
Patagonia Down With It Parka	$299	8.3 oz. of 600-fill	forty in.	ii lbs. 5.eight oz.	No
REI Co-op Norseland Parka	$199	650-fill down	36.5 in.	Unavailable	No
Patagonia Tres three-in-ane Parka	$599	5.3 oz. of 700-make full	35.5 in.	3 lbs. 3 oz.	Yes
Outdoor Research Super Alpine	$399	7 oz. of 800-fill up	32.5 in.	1 lb. 9.9 oz.	No
Canada Goose Trek Parka	$i,495	625-fill downwards	32 in.	4 lbs. 3 oz.	No
The North Confront Arctic Parka	$300	550-fill & constructed	35.75 in.	two lbs. 13.5 oz.	Yes
Outdoor Research Coze Parka	$349	8.iii oz. of 700-make full	43 in.	2 lbs. iii.5 oz.	No
Fjallraven Nuuk Parka	$500	Constructed (8.eight oz.)	33.9 in.	3 lbs. 4.ii oz.	Aye
Outdoor Enquiry Coldfront	$229	6.three oz. of 700-fill & synthetic	29.5 in.	1 lb. 5.2 oz.	No
MH Stretchdown Parka	$325	700-fill down	33 in.	i lb. half dozen oz.	No
Arc'teryx Patera Parka	$649	5.5 oz. of 750-fill & synthetic	36.75 in.	i lb. 15.9 oz.	Yeah
Patagonia DAS Parka	$449	Synthetic (133g/40g)	30 in.	1 lb. 2.4 oz.	No
Marmot Montreal Coat	$285	vii.1 oz. of 700-make full	33 in.	2 lbs. ii.2 oz.	No
REI Co-op Stormhenge Down	$259	850-fill up & synthetic	28.25 in.	1 lb. 10 oz.	Yes
Patagonia Jackson Glacier Parka	$399	six oz. of 700-fill	38 in.	2 lbs. 1.2 oz.	No
The Due north Face up Metropolis	$300	550-make full down	37 in.	i lb. 11.5 oz.	No
Cotopaxi Solazo	$220	650-fill down	27 in.	14 oz.	No
Arc'teryx Andessa Jacket	$949	2.1 oz. of 750-fill & synthetic	26 in.	ane lb. 15.half-dozen oz.	Yep
Columbia Heavenly Long	$150	Polyester	34 in.	Unavailable	No

Women'southward Winter Jacket Buying Communication

• Casual vs. Performance Winter Jackets
• Insulation Types
• Warmth
  • Fill Ability
  • Fill Weight
• Temperature Rating
• Center Back Length
• Fit and Sizing
• Layering
• Weight and Packability
• Water-Resistant vs. Waterproof
• Air current Protection
• Hood
  

Casual vs. Performance Winter Jackets

When deciding on a winter jacket, the single nearly of import factor volition exist its intended use. Casual winter jackets are designed for everyday wear around boondocks and are characterized by their urban styling, excellent coverage, and typically heavy builds. Thigh- and knee-length parkas fall into this category and are very popular among women for their warmth and classy looks. Performance jackets, on the other hand, are more technical in nature, built to handle mountain weather (exist it cold or wet), and frequently lighter in weight due to the apply of premium downward and thinner crush materials. These models are designed for activities like mountaineering, climbing, and other common cold-weather backcountry use.

Jackets in our casual category are great for in-town employ

The skilful news is that going with a casual coat generally saves you a good deal of money. Two of our top casual picks, The North Face's Arctic and the Patagonia Down With It Parka, are around $300 nonetheless offer ample warmth and weather protection for nearly people. The compromises come in weight, packability, and range of movement, which matter if you're climbing mountains simply not and then much for the morning commute. And for casual users drawn to the look of jackets in the performance category, exist sure go on in mind that these are generally less durable and won't hold up as well to everyday wear.

Insulation Types

Almost all the jackets on this list take down fill, which is the warmest, lightest, and most compressible type of insulation. A few jackets, including the Columbia Heavenly Long, are made with synthetic, which is heavier and not quite every bit lofty merely does a superior task at insulating when wet. It's also cheaper than down, which is why you'll find it within some of the budget-oriented designs in a higher place like the Columbia Heavenly. We dear both types of insulation and each has its purposes, but down wins out in pure warmth and coziness for wintertime.

Down is the warmest and lightest form of insulation

The ethical debate between down and synthetic insulation is an important one, but non as cut-and-dry as some might wish. Down is piece of cake to scrutinize, with concerns around sourcing feathers and humane handling of animals. On the other mitt, most synthetic fills are petroleum-based, which results in greenhouse gas emissions and potentially unsafe work environments. Further, they can release micro pieces of plastic into the h2o during each launder. Thankfully, programs like the Responsible Down Standard ensure the use of ethically sourced downwardly, which makes it a much easier sell for us. Non to mention, down generally has a longer lifespan than synthetic insulation. For more background on this topic, see our article on downwardly vs. synthetic insulation.

The Responsible Down Standard ensures ethically sourced downwardly

Warmth

Warmth is a function of many variables: insulation type and weight, beat fabrics, wind, layering, level of exertion, and how warm or cold you lot run personally. But all other factors being equal, the two most important specs to look at when determining the warmth of your jacket are fill power and fill up weight.

Fill Power
Make full power is the nearly heavily marketed spec among winter jackets and parkas, and it refers to down specifically. The higher the number (600-fill, 700-fill, 800-fill, etc.), the more than loft and warmth the down will provide and the more easily it will shrink when packing the jacket away. Premium downward is the most expensive, which is why you'll see this number loosely correlate with price. Performance winter jackets normally are around 800-fill or higher, and casual pieces run from 450-make full to 700-fill.

A higher fill power denotes high (i.e., more premium) downward

Fill Weight
Fill weight is often disregarded but just every bit relevant as fill up power. Instead of measuring the quality of the down, fill up weight indicates the total weight of the downwards inside the jacket. For example, the Rab Deep Cover Parka (non listed above due to problems with stock) has a whopping 12 ounces of 700-fill down, while the Patagonia Jackson Glacier Parka has only half dozen ounces of 700-fill up, which represents a meaning divergence in warmth. The adding becomes more than difficult the greater the gap in fill powers: comparing 850-fill down to 500-fill up downwardly is similar comparison apples to oranges, so it's nearly helpful when the fill powers are at least like.

Unfortunately, fill weight isn't always provided by manufacturers, particularly for casual pieces. We've done everything within our ability to acquire that number—including spending seemingly endless periods of time on hold and explaining to customer service reps that fill up weight is different than fill power—and include information technology in our comparing table when available. Around one-half the jackets on this list provide fill weight, which is more helpful than not.

The Arc'teryx Patera Parka contains 5.5 ounces of 750-fill down

Temperature Rating

Winter jackets don't have a uniform method of measuring warmth like the EN organisation for sleeping bags, but there are some good clues. As discussed above, make sure to take both fill up power and fill up weight into account. In addition, the shell of the jacket matters, as do the layers underneath.

By our best estimation, the majority of the jackets on this list are designed to go well beneath freezing for use in the eye of the winter months in cold climates similar the Midwest and East Coast of the United States. Some jackets are capable of even more extreme conditions (the Canada Goose Trek Parka is given a -22°F rating by the manufacturer), while others are less insulated and designed for active use (REI'southward Stormhenge Down Hybrid). Of course, layer well and don't take any chances, but this article presents that warmest jackets that we cover on this site. For more lightweight and midweight jacket options, meet our articles on the best down jackets for women and best synthetic jackets.

The jackets in a higher place are designed for employ in the depths of winter

Centre Back Length

The jackets on our list above come in a variety of lengths, ranging from 26 inches for the Arc'teryx Andessa to 43 inches for the Outdoor Enquiry Coze Downward Parka. In the vast bulk of cases, this measurement is taken down the center of back, where a jacket is at its longest (some hems are uniform all the way effectually while others feature a drop-tail in the back). Hip-length jackets check in anywhere from 26 to well-nigh 30 inches, below-the-barrel parkas are effectually 33 inches, and mid-thigh to knee-length parkas range from about 35 to 43 inches in length. The heart back length tin be an important consideration when y'all're shopping for a jacket, every bit it has a big affect on style, warmth, and coverage. Keep in mind that if you opt for a longer jacket, you'll want to look for features similar slits (these tin can be in the forepart, dorsum, or at the sides) and two-manner zippers, which help to keep range of movement high.

Jacket length has a big affect on mode, warmth, and coverage

Fit and Sizing

Wintertime jackets can exist all over the place in terms of fit. Some, like the Marmot Montreal, are rather trim, while others, and particularly performance jackets like the Outdoor Research Super Alpine Downward Parka, provide ample space for freedom of motility and layering. It's a strong generalization, but expect casual pieces to run a fleck small (nosotros've oftentimes found the need to size up) and performance pieces to be roomier. When applicable, we've chosen out sizing discrepancies in the write-ups to a higher place, but in that location's really no substitute for going into your local gear shop and trying on jackets in person.

When it comes to the parkas in a higher place, proceed in mind that these come in a diversity of lengths ranging from but below the barrel (the Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown and Marmot Montreal, for example) to above-the-human knee designs like the Outdoor Inquiry Coze. While parkas are the clear winners in terms of warmth and coverage (and arguably manner), it's important to understand where these designs fall short. In general, the longer the hem, the more restrictive a parka will be—we've had to pull up jackets around our waist while biking—and many of these designs take a trend to bunch up on your lap while sitting. Nosotros've establish that slits similar those on the REI Co-op Norseland (side) or Arc'teryx Patera (front) go a long way in solving this problem, and you'll want to be sure the design features a two-fashion zipper.

A two-way nada is a really nice characteristic on a parka-length jacket

Layering

A major contributor to warmth is which layers (or lack thereof) you lot wear underneath your jacket. Due to the hefty amount of insulation within nigh of the jackets to a higher place, a uncomplicated baselayer will do the trick in cold atmospheric condition that hasn't all the same reached frigid status. Depending on the parka, when the temperature really drops (think well below freezing), you may desire to add together a lightweight down or synthetic jacket as a midlayer. This would be a lot of insulation, but it'south an easy adjustment to make so long as you have the extra gear and the jacket has room for layering. Warmth is a lot about personal preference and the specifics of the activity and weather condition, but it'south ever a good idea to carry an extra layer or two should you get cold or the conditions change.

Performance winter jackets are typically sized for layering

Weight and Packability

The importance of weight in your ownership conclusion depends largely on intended use. For those looking in the performance category (mountaineers, climbers, winter explorers, etc.), jackets with large amounts of premium down will be the warmest, lightest, and nearly packable. Our tiptop pick in this category is the OR Super Alpine, which checks in at 1 pound 2.7 ounces. For those buying at the casual end of the market, weight matters much less—you almost likely won't be carrying your downwards jacket in a backpack and don't intendance as much about shaving ounces. Many coincidental winter jackets and parkas push the 3-pound mark and higher (Canada Goose lists their Expedition at iv lbs. 3 oz.) and won't pack downward as small with lower-fill-power downwardly.

Most downwards parka prioritize condolement, warmth, and manner over weight

A jacket's weight and packability ofttimes get hand in hand, so taking a look at the weight spec should give you a adequately authentic idea of how compressible each jacket is. Like weight, packability is paramount for performance utilize but won't matter too much for most casual users—although it does take implications for stuffing in a duffel when traveling. A packable jacket (like the Patagonia Down With It and DAS Parkas) will be much easier to stuff away in a checked bag or overhead bin, whereas the 4-plus-pound Canada Goose Expedition Parka volition fill an entire acquit-on suitcase. If packability matters, we recommend opting for a hip-length jacket or a uncomplicated down parka with thin shell material similar the Marmot Montreal. And as we mentioned above, downwards is much more packable than synthetic insulation.

In addition to the type and amount of insulation, a jacket's shell fabric has a large influence on its weight and packability. Operation jackets tend to use technical fabrics that are calorie-free and thin, while coincidental pieces use more durable and heavier shells that add together weight. On the upside, the thicker shells are much meliorate at avoiding tears and small abrasions and therefore should last longer. Lightweight down jackets crave quite a bit of care and attention and are not our first choice for everyday apply (unless you don't mind the odd patch here and there).

Performance-oriented downwards jackets will pack down impressively minor

Water-Resistant vs. Waterproof

Downward loses its power to insulate when wet, and therefore all jackets on this list offer some protection against precipitation. Almost jackets are water-resistant or h2o-repellant, significant they accept a tightly woven face fabric and durable water repellant (DWR) coating that will bead upwardly and shed lite moisture. If you combine that with treated or hydrophobic downwards—a treatment added to the down itself that reduces water absorption and helps information technology dry faster—you accept yourself a pretty constructive system fifty-fifty in wet and heavy snow.

DWR causes water to dewdrop up and curlicue off the shell material

The reality is that if you'll be wearing a full-on wintertime jacket, information technology's unlikely yous'll crave complete waterproofing. H2o-resistant shells, like what you get with the Marmot Montreal and Patagonia Jackson Glacier Parka, offering plenty of protection in freezing, snowy weather. If you practice need consummate waterproofing, however, there are some options on the marketplace including the Arc'teryx Patera and The North Face Chill. The Patera has fully taped seams and a waterproof Gore-Tex shell for staying dry if information technology happens to be 34 degrees and pouring rain.

Wind Protection

Exposure to wind can make an otherwise freezing winter day fifty-fifty more unbearable. In terms of the current of air resistance of a wintertime jacket, a number of factors come into play including the type and thickness of the shell, corporeality and distribution of the insulation, and fabric of the liner. In particular, the vanquish itself matters most: on performance jackets, you lot'll see names like Gore Windstopper or Pertex for excellent air current resistance at low weights, and casual coats frequently block the wind by the sheer thickness of the face fabric. In the end, the truth is that all of these jackets do a respectable job at keeping wind and the other elements at bay. Midweight and lightweight jackets are much less substantial, and you run the hazard of catching a cold breeze through the jacket itself, but this list is composed of heavyweights that all should be considered highly wind-resistant.

Nigh jackets hither do a fairly good job resisting current of air

Hood

Perhaps more than than any other type of jacket, the hood matters a lot with a winter coat. First, the hood nearly always is going to have the same blazon of insulation as the rest of the jacket, and then premium down in the torso of the coat ways excellent warmth for the weight in the hood. Second, a good cold-weather hood can be adapted and tightened around the head snugly so that wind doesn't enter or blow the hood off your head (many casual jackets will have an additional fur brim—often removable—for sealing in warmth, while nigh technical models have tempest flaps around the collar to block out cold air). Finally, many performance-oriented jackets have helmet-uniform hoods, which are necessary for mountaineering and climbing. Helmet compatibility makes the hood larger and slightly less desirable for wearing without a helmet, but it isn't a deal-billow for usa equally long equally the hood cinches downwards evenly.

A fur skirt is not bad for sealing in warmth

For use on mild-weather days, some prefer the choice to remove the hood from their winter coat altogether. Simply put, these hoods are bulky and can exist abrasive if they're just sitting along the dorsum of your head. Most designs have a zipper located just below the collar to make information technology easy to both remove and put back on. The feature does add together weight and bulk, then you lot'll typically find information technology on casual winter jackets. Whether this is a priority will come up downward to personal preference, but information technology could be a difference maker in the jacket yous select. For instance, the Marmot Montreal has a removable hood, while the Canada Goose Trek Parka does not (however, you can remove the fur ruff).
Dorsum to Our Women's Wintertime Jacket Picks  Back to Our Women's Winter Jacket Comparing Tabular array

embleyputeent.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.switchbacktravel.com/best-womens-winter-jackets

Share this post